Yes, absolutely. If you get married and already own a home, during the marriage, all of the payments that you make on the home are community. So if you want to keep the house separate, because it hasn’t been paid off yet, you want to make sure that you get a prenup saying that all the payments are going to be made from a separate account and there’s not going to be any community funds involved. NEVER CO-MINGLE ACCOUNTS. When you leave, you still own the home–your spouse can move out and own nothing of the home.
Maintain a good relationship with your personal injury attorney. All too often people see a big rig accident attorney as an adversary; however nothing could be further from the truth. estate tax attorney near me okc want to help you.
Seeking out additional employment can be a way to handle your debts. You may be able to avoid bankruptcy by negotiating with your creditors in order to find a workable plan for paying off your debt. Most will accede to your wishes and prevent the filing of bankruptcy.
The effects of divorce is not a one time thing. It goes far beyond what they feel when they are told about the divorce. Do your best to set a good example for your children by maintaining the best relationship with your soon to be ex as possible. People will tell you that children are resilient as if this won’t affect them. While it is true that they are resilient you need to make it as easy for them as possible.
2) Keeping property. This is important depending on what you own and how nice it is. Many people filing chapter 7 bankruptcies are what is considered no asset cases. Meaning that with bankruptcy exemptions and other timing options of filing the bankruptcy petition they keep ALL their property and do not lose a thing in a bankruptcy filing. Lets face it though many of these people do not have much which is why they get to keep it all, but you might be surprised as to how much you can keep in a bankruptcy. If you have a lot of nice things though, filing bankruptcy might mean getting rid of them, and that, for some, is unthinkable.
So, for example, the parent who has kept the children will prevent the other parent from seeing them or, the «non-resident» parent may refuse to provide financial support for the benefit of the children. Sometimes, on the basis that the other parent will spend the money on themselves. In my mind that is a moot point because that parent will still have to meet the day to day expenses for the children. So there really is no reason for one parent to withhold financial support from another parent just for the sake of it.
